<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>JohnB blog - Latest Comments in Relative search</title><link>http://johnbblog.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:24:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Relative search</title><link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2008/12/09/relative-search/#comment-16303950</link><description>great post</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">talktalk1</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:24:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relative search</title><link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2008/12/09/relative-search/#comment-14894877</link><description>thank you for sharing this</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richardz315</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 21:09:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relative search</title><link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2008/12/09/relative-search/#comment-13500660</link><description>Using Google or other search engine for good traffic is really hard because you have lots of competitors..&lt;br&gt;Good work..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">celebri001</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:11:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relative search</title><link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2008/12/09/relative-search/#comment-13102548</link><description>Excellent site, useful information .Thanks for this great post - I will be sure to check out your blog more often....&lt;a href="http://buyonlineinuk.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://online-shopping-websites.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://produkt-informationen.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://readproductreviews.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://shoponlineincanada.blog.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://online-shop-french.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://onlineshoppinginusa.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://shoppingonlineinuk.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href="http://us-online-shopping.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;.&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kongrit</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:36:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relative search</title><link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2008/12/09/relative-search/#comment-10264401</link><description>Was a good read.  I'll be back for more.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">craigs2</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:20:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Relative search</title><link>http://www.borthwick.com/weblog/2008/12/09/relative-search/#comment-6142978</link><description>Relativity is what made Google so highly relevant in the early days with Page Rank. Page Rank lets well established organizations "vote" who they want to give legitimacy to. That was a big improvement over keyword stuffing, but still extremely oligarchical. What you see here is further democratization of the ranking process and I think if implemented properly can only be a good thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lonestarsoftware</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:14:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>